2048 and the Mind

In the past couple weeks, there's been an influx of coverage on the new addicting game 2048, comparing it to other gaming sensations like Flappy Bird and Candy Crush. Thanks to my Facebook newsfeed, I had already become mildly addicted to 2048, and in doing so, realized a key ability in the game to implicitly affect how players think about real-life hierarchies.

If you haven't played the game, the goal is to combine lower numbers which double each time, to reach the number 2048 or even higher. So having a grid full of 2's and 4's can be extremely frustrating. As I played the fraternity version, something began bothering me about its structure. I found myself coveting the "higher-ranked" fraternities and irritated seeing "lower-ranked" ones on my board. Although I don't care much for Greek rankings, the more I played, the more I subconsciously valued the higher-status Greek letters. It occurred to me that this subtle effect could lead to implicit attitudes, attitudes I didn't even realize having, about Greek organizations. I immediately switched over to the standard 2048.

2048's open source nature reveals hidden biases

This wouldn't be the first time that video games have laid the foundation for implicit biases in players. Others have tried to use games as a way to reduce implicit bias. But cues for implicit attitudes come from all around us. In everyday situations, people react to implicit biases involving race, gender and appearance. These biases have been proven through Implicit Association Tests (IATs), as well as referenced frequently in behavioral books including Blink by Malcolm Gladwell and Lean In by Sheryl Sandberg.

2048 is still new enough that there isn't any sort of public research on the addictive game, so this is not exactly a data-driven observation. But 2048 itself is a game built on copies. 2048 stemmed from a game 1024, which copied the original game of Threes. Now, there are tons of similar games flooding in. In fact, there are already several sites dedicated to aggregating all the 2048 variants. So it may not be long before someone creates a variation that promotes or creates ingrained biases. Especially as the format of 2048 is perfectly suited to translate into hierarchical structures.

I don't know if any of these creators used the game purposefully, knowing how it could affect players. But it is worth noting by those who design games like 2048 and its variants as well as those who obsessively play it that even the most simple games that reel us in are also capable of affecting us in much deeper ways. 

Please comment with your experiences with 2048 or other similar games!

The Beauty of Unpracticality

Scrolling through my usual visual design and art blogs, I stumbled upon a series of work that really lived up to its name. A set of-- I guess "sculptures" is the closest term to what these objects are-- dubbed the "Uncomfortable" series by Athens-based architect Katerina Kamprani really did make me feel more uneasy than I had felt in a long while.

This series included simple, everyday objects that had been manipulated or changed in one serious way that completely obliterated its practicality. For example, one of the pieces in the series was a watering can which emptied into itself, therefore never capable of hydrating anyone's flowers. Other pieces included a furry plate that would just be the definition of unpleasant to eat anything off of, and a bowl with a small hole intentionally drilled into its bottom, thus obliterating its primary responsibility of containing liquids.

Useless watering can

The reasons these objects make a viewer feel uncomfortable are obvious on a surface level, but when examined deeper, they reveal quite a bit about how most humans view not only art but all objects in the world around them. When asked about her project, Kamprani called "Uncomfortable" "a collection of deliberately inconvenient everyday objects," adding that it "started as a twisted sadistic design project. It messed up its creator's head (and the heads of people she knows). It exists in sketches and 3-D visualizations and has no meaningful purpose. It's a parasite in the world of materialism and design."

Humans look to objects in order to utilize them, and if they can't use them, they should at least be able to find some semblance of meaning in them. By purposefully removing any utilitarian capabilities from the everyday objects Kamprani chose, she forced people to resort to finding meaning in them to accept their value in the world. This is why Kamprani's "scuptures" become art. Not only do they make an aspect of the human psyche clearer to the human population, but they also convey meanings in similar ways as an abstract dot upon a canvas does at the Museum of Modern Art in New York City.